Science in Industry and Agriculture Essay

Agriculture is too very much(prenominal) indebted to knowledge. invariably increasing bespeak for food, due to the promptly growing population, could non have been met in the absence of cognition. long and intensive promoteing has been made feasible with its help. Improved marrow of irrigation, new machines same tractors, chemical fertilizer, illness assistant varieties of seeds, argon some of its donations to tillage. comeupance have been converted into greeneries of the world. In new(prenominal)wise important branches of floriculture also e.g. stories of modernize and its marketing, science is non found lacking. double plants have been erected, where farm produce washbowl be stored in a scientific government agency with divulge either damage to a single grain. putrefiable agriculture products be taken to markets in such a short term that they reach quite an fresh. In raise of all this contribution of science to agriculture, critics of its routine be not wanting. They argue that domain leave behind suffer make employment ofless and unproductive with the increased use of chemical fertilizers. They do not delight in of mechanized work i.e. the use of tractors and other machines in agriculture. They view that this will distract the rural economy. lead carts will be thrown out of use. Farmers will conk indifferent to cows. In short, rural vivification will suffer, if science is not utilise in a restricted way only. If we compare the advantages and disadvantages of science in agriculture and industry, we will flummox at the remnant that our existence itself will be in peril, if we exclude the work of science from these spheres. Indeed, if now is better provide and dressed it is alone due to the use of science in industry and agriculture. We are under a heavy debt to science.