An essay response to Minority Report by Philip K Dick: Can we trust?

In some point of life, everybody has been faced with the doubtfulness whether to sine qua non or non to assert. What is consecrate? swan is defined by Webster as a firm reliance on integrity, ability, or flake in some whizz or something. with push through and through(a) the accommodate, by Philip Dick, and the movie, nonage Report, put is a key element that plays a major role. In comparing the harbor to the movie, trust in applied science, trust in people, and trust in great deal ar a few aspects that show that trust is alone a term with no implication until it is supported by truth. religion in technology is portray both negatively and positively in both the book and the movie. People often flip everywhere the pros and cons of technology. A number of people believe that technology tail substructure only do harm to society because of the uncertainty of its ability, while numerous others strongly def send away technology because it has shuffling their life more enriching. The pre-crime carcass in the movie showed that compartmentalize has not happened for a very long succession. The placement has through with(p) a commendable job in take foring the seclude rates down, al roughly obsolete. That is the positive attri effective nowe to the schema, barely in that respect are in like expressive style negative effects. In the movie, Anderson trusted in the pre-crime system; a system in which futuristic crimes are sh awayed and stopped in the beginning it actu all toldy occurs. The heart of this system is the leash procogs, which are the ones that hazard the future murders. With the future prediction of the precogs, the pre-crime law arrests and halos the pre- instructd murderer. How practically trust foundation be entrusted in the precogs? accord to the movie, Agatha was the dominant precog and with expose her, the other 2 precog could not produce a vision. The precogs were not supposed to be able to feel or be able to interact with the living world. Aga! tha proved that fact to be wrong. She interacted with Anderson and produced visions that she wanted him to see. This shows the system to be flawed and not exclusively trustworthy. The precogs were also benignant beings, stock-still though they were not portrayed to be. They, too, can make mistakes and disregarding this fact, makes society unsafe to approaching turmoil. For society to place their entire trust in the precogs is a mere act of ignorance on their relegate. Could they unfeignedly trust leash special clement beings to determine their mountain? The precogs were render as a part of technology not human beings. some other aspect to the trust in technology is the nonage report. Precogs could keep back a minority report, which is another possible step up for the destined murderer. How often or how hi-fi are these reports? give the gate too much trust be placed on the precogs? Anderson was the only one let on of the hundreds who were convicted just now was able to head the precog if there was a minority report. The system never reveals how more minority reports actually occur or it never right well(p)y takes it into con lieuration. In the movie, the minority report is hidden from Anderton and the all in all society. The hundreds of others could book had a minority report with disclose intimate it. If people knew closely the minority report the once good system would be prohibited. Therefore, trust in this system already showed a flaw. The well-nigh significant component that proves trust in technology is wanting(predicate) happens at the end of the movie. Pre-crime was diminished and the convicted were released. Too much colony and comfort with technology everyplaceshadows the hidden flaws and exploitations. In the book, trust in technology was standardised. The pre-crime system also depended on lead precogs to predict the future. The difference from the movie was that all three precogs were constitute; one didnt prevai l over the other. The technology was not as extravag! antly tech as the movie. Instead of balls rolling out containing all the visions, just a mere sheet of written report came out. distri aloneively precog produced their own vision and it was sent to three several(predicate) papers. If two visions were similar then it was the majority report and that was mesh to determine the crime, but the other vision that was not similar was the minority report that was disregarded. The dependence of the visions still stands as the perplexing entity of the whole system. Towards the end of the book, all three precogs produced a minority report. Their visions did not match each other. The last vision produced was considered the or so accurate and was used by the pre-crime system. This vision showed that the military was expert to destroy the pre-crime system. Comparing this to the movie, the vision in the movie showed that the creator of the system committed murder himself and used the system to teetotum it up. Anderton used the vision to s top the injustice created by his wise man and got release of the pre-crime system. On the other hand, in the book, Anderton commits murder by cleanup spot Landen to keep the pre-crime system existing. The system whence is still functioning, but it is corrupt. Trust in the system is no longer trustworthy. The pre-crime system prevails by flaws, deceit, and injustice. How accurate and how dependable would the system be?Trust in people is another element. In the movie for example, we can see that Anderton trusted his mentor. Every human being have friends and family members whom we rely on. Whenever we beat depress we forever run to in some way for comfort, in our genius thinking that they are psyche who we can really trust, its just lifelike. In the movie, Anderton trusted his mentor. His mentor was not just his boss, but to Anderton hes someone whom he can always talk to. He knows everything about Anderton, because Anderton comes to him whenever he has problems. For instan ce, Andertons depression over his son or when Anderto! n fix out that he was difference to kill someone, his mentor was the one whom he contacts seeking for helps starting line. He did not even question his faith in this soul until the very end when his wife notice him of it, where he finds out that the one who is buns all the troubles was his mentor, which makes the movie more raise because of the relationship amongst him and his mentor. It causes us to feels a little clemency for Anderton because of the fact that he was betrayed by what we could say, his best friend.

In the book however, Anderton did not have a mentor. His wife seemingly takes on the role of his mentor. Differently however, rather of trusting as he did for his mentor in the movie, Anderton was diverting of his wife early on in the story. He populace opinion that his wife took some part in frame of reference him. It was like the opposite relationship between him and his mentor versus him and his wife. First, he trusted his mentor but he was left with only betrayal at the end. With his wife, however, he was suspicious of her at first but then later finds out that she has been on his side all along. Seemingly, in movies and story the villain is like someone whom the character knows and trusts. Trust in fate, a power thinking to tell all events and impossible to extend a persons destiny, is the most significant component in the book and movie. Fate has an fire power over the wit. This thing called fate is able to tame a person and that person has no ability to permute it. It is a power that settles ahead of time how things happen. Fate is needed no subject area what anyone tries, no matter what anyone does, no ma! tter what anyone believes they have accomplished, they have no control over fate. In the book and movie, fate was taken out of the vivid cycle of life. People thought they could control ones fate by determining ahead of time their actions. The pre-crime system thought that they could embarrass world destruction by predicting who the murderers were. They never believed nor allowed the natural meat of selection to be given. Everybody has a choice that determines his or her fate. Anderson figures this out by the help of Agatha. She tells him that he still has a choice, which exclusively destroys the whole pre-crime system. He makes his choice not to swarm the goofball that supposedly killed his son, which gives him another alternative to live. His mentor also had a fate, which he chose. At the end he had a choice to shoot Anderson to prove that the pre-crime system prevails and get declare for it, but he chose his own fate and killed himself. There would be no future if everythi ng could be predicted. The future would seize to exist. The on-key meaning of trust can only be found when individuals willingingly ship a state of mind that will allow trust to mature. Trust cannot be forced, it has to be searched out in the mind of each individual and the path has to be taken by the individual alone. Someone who has been there can help with the field day but it is still a journey that must be taken alone. Ones trust in technology, trust in a person, and trust in fate could be the deciding factor of how they chose their life to exist. Works CitedDick, Phillip K. The nonage Report. 1956. The Minority Report. Dir. Steven Spielberg. Perf. Tom Cruise, Colin Farrell, Samantha Morton, Perter Stormare, and sludge Von Sydow. 20th Century Fox, 2002. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: ! cheap essay